animate-twcss-bridge@2.0.6
A configurable, namespaced Animate.css integration for Tailwind CSS
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18066 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
Manual ReviewIndependent AI assessment: manual_review. LPM AI review remains unresolved.
The inspected package source implements Tailwind animation style generation and shows no confirmed attack behavior. The source of a required runtime dependency was unavailable, so a clean verdict cannot be established.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- The manifest declares the animation utility as a runtime dependency, and the plugin calls its style-building path when Tailwind invokes the plugin.
- The motion module imports and invokes that utility to generate CSS variables; its source could not be verified in the available dependency snapshot.
- The package entrypoint builds Tailwind base styles and utilities from animation data, with no install lifecycle scripts in the inspected manifest.
Source & flagged code
4 flagged · loading sourceThe manifest declares the animation utility as a runtime dependency, and the plugin calls its style-building path when Tailwind invokes the plugin.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L29The manifest declares the animation utility as a runtime dependency, and the plugin calls its style-building path when Tailwind invokes the plugin.
plugin.jsView on unpkg · L8Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to animate-twcss-bridge@2.0.6.
See all versions of animate-twcss-bridge for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing animate-twcss-bridge@2.0.6. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.