tailwind-animationlab
A configurable, namespaced Animate.css integration for Tailwind CSS
This report shows the evidence for tailwind-animationlab@2.0.6, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18080 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
Manual ReviewIndependent AI assessment: manual_review. LPM AI review remains unresolved.
The inspected package code presents a CSS generation path and shows no concrete attack behavior. A required imported dependency's source was unavailable in the registry snapshot, so its behavior remains unresolved and prevents a clean verdict.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- package.json declares the motion helper as a required dependency.
- src/motion.js imports that helper and passes it into PostCSS processing.
- plugin.js invokes the style builder when Tailwind runs the plugin.
- The inspected package code uses the helper to build CSS styles; it establishes no attack behavior. The helper's source was unavailable for review.
Source & flagged code
4 flagged · loading sourcepackage.json declares the motion helper as a required dependency.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L32src/motion.js imports that helper and passes it into PostCSS processing.
src/motion.jsView on unpkg · L5src/motion.js imports that helper and passes it into PostCSS processing.
src/motion.jsFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to tailwind-animationlab@2.0.6.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing tailwind-animationlab@2.0.6. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.