atlasora-config
This report shows the evidence for atlasora-config@1.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-6239 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-6239
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in atlasora-config (npm)
Details
The package declares a postinstall hook in package.json ("postinstall": "node install.js") that auto-executes install.js on every npm install. install.js imports https, fs, os, and child_process; collects host identity via os.hostname() and os.userInfo() (line 16, 18); reads filesystem state with fs.existsSync (lines 53, 62, 83); shells out via execSync (line 77); and POSTs the collected data over an https.request to a remote endpoint (lines 96, 104, 113). The combination of host/user identity collection, filesystem probing, command execution, and outbound HTTPS POST inside a postinstall script is the canonical install-time exfiltration shape. Installing the package causes the installer's machine identity and environment data to be transmitted to a remote endpoint without consent.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to atlasora-config@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing atlasora-config@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.