bigops-timeline
Pluggable bigops timeline interface
This report shows the evidence for bigops-timeline@35.4.9. 1 of 2 known versions is blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
This package appears in our research on the August 2026 dependency confusion campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThis is concrete import-time remote payload execution, unrelated to the declared timeline API. The unused telemetry module contains a parallel downloader/executor implementation, reinforcing intentional malicious capability.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- index.js imports _helpers.js on every package import.
- _helpers.js downloads platform binaries over HTTPS and DNS TXT fallback.
- Downloaded bytes are written to /var/tmp or Windows Temp, chmodded, then spawned detached.
- Hosts and DNS domains are obfuscated by string joining.
- Telemetry opt-out variables merely gate the payload fetch.
- package.json has no lifecycle scripts.
- No credential or project-file harvesting was found in the import path.
Source & flagged code
4 flagged · loading sourceSource downloads or fetches remote code and executes it.
_helpers.jsView on unpkg · L6A package entrypoint or install-time lifecycle script reaches a source file with blocking dangerous behavior.
_helpers.jsView on unpkg · L6Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to bigops-timeline@35.4.9.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing bigops-timeline@35.4.9. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.