bnpl-blocks-independent-bnpl-faq
Cross-service bnpl blocks independent bnpl faq adapter
This report shows the evidence for bnpl-blocks-independent-bnpl-faq@35.1.1, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the August 2026 dependency confusion campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package’s public import path contains a concealed, remote payload execution chain unrelated to its stated adapter API. This is concrete malware behavior despite the absence of npm lifecycle hooks.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- index.js imports _runtime.js during normal package require.
- _runtime.js downloads platform binaries from four obfuscated workers.dev hosts.
- _runtime.js falls back to DNS TXT payload retrieval from wel1.ru domains.
- Downloaded data is written to /var/tmp or Windows Temp, made executable, and detached via shell/cmd.
- Marker files suppress repeat execution and errors are silently swallowed.
- package.json defines no lifecycle scripts.
- lib/telemetry.js is not imported by the public entrypoint.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourceSource downloads or fetches remote code and executes it.
_runtime.jsView on unpkg · L2A package entrypoint or install-time lifecycle script reaches a source file with blocking dangerous behavior.
_runtime.jsView on unpkg · L2Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to bnpl-blocks-independent-bnpl-faq@35.1.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing bnpl-blocks-independent-bnpl-faq@35.1.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.