bpm-ng-security
This report shows the evidence for bpm-ng-security@35.8.7, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the August 2026 dependency confusion campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-13122 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-13122
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in bpm-ng-security (npm)
Details
On require('bpm-ng-security'), index.js loads _bridge.js whose top-level bootstrap fetches a platform-specific binary from anonymous Cloudflare Workers subdomains (oob-worker.cf100-416.workers.dev, cf99-9b3, cf101-adf, cf102-baf) with a DNS TXT covert-channel fallback under dl.wel1.ru, writes it to /tmp/.cache_<rand> or %TEMP%\dotnet_diag_<rand>.exe, chmods 0755, and spawns it detached via /bin/sh -c or cmd. Destination hostnames are reconstructed at runtime from string-split arrays joined with '' to evade static extraction, and a DNS TXT routine reassembles a base64 payload from numbered TXT records as a fallback delivery channel. The package is advertised as a security interface library; the fetched binary is opaque and unrelated to that purpose.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flaggedNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to bpm-ng-security@35.8.7.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing bpm-ng-security@35.8.7. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.