chai-as-rendered
This report shows the evidence for chai-as-rendered@1.2.0, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the fake chai plugin campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 29d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-12348 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-12348
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in chai-as-rendered (npm)
Details
Typosquat of chai-as-promised. The package's exported middleware spawns a detached child process (lib/caller.js) that fetches a JSON payload from a base64-obfuscated jsonstorage.net URL (https://api.jsonstorage.net/v1/json/2ef8c758-a96f-459e-b036-b3b90379a165/f89e8264-86c2-4684-94da-c3f82d59370f) and evaluates the returned.cookie string via new Function.constructor("require", s)(require), giving the fetched code full require access on the installer's host. The remote URL and request headers are stored as base64 strings under fake process.env names (DEV_API_KEY, DEV_SECRET_KEY, DEV_SECRET_VALUE) and decoded with atob() at runtime to conceal the destination. The package name and keywords (fast, logger, stream, json) impersonate pino while the package name typosquats chai-as-promised.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to chai-as-rendered@1.2.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing chai-as-rendered@1.2.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.