claims-ac1
This report shows the evidence for claims-ac1@1.0.0. 1 of 3 known versions is blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18450 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
The nested remote tarball chain is unusual and its executable behavior cannot be established from the available source, so it warrants a warning. No lifecycle hook, entry-point behavior, or concrete attack is shown.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- The package declares a dependency on a tarball hosted at a GitHub repository path named `ping_test`.
- The prepared `node-ac2` manifest declares `index.js` as its main file and adds another tarball dependency from the same repository.
- The available manifests declare no lifecycle scripts, and the root manifest has no main or bin entry point.
- The inspected source does not establish what either tarball's executable code does or show a concrete attack.
Source & flagged code
3 flaggedThe package declares a dependency on a tarball hosted at a GitHub repository path named `ping_test`.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L1Package manifest contains a dependency pinned to a remote tarball URL.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to claims-ac1@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing claims-ac1@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.