claims-historical-claims-domain
Claims historical claims domain abstraction layer
This report shows the evidence for claims-historical-claims-domain@35.4.4, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the August 2026 dependency confusion campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThis is a concrete import-time remote payload execution chain, not telemetry. The large telemetry file contains the same payload-hosting primitive, while _bridge.js makes it immediately reachable.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- index.js:23 imports _bridge on every package import.
- _bridge.js:76 downloads platform-specific bytes from obfuscated worker hosts.
- _bridge.js:94 reconstructs binary payloads from DNS TXT records.
- _bridge.js:171 writes the payload to a temp file and chmods it executable.
- _bridge.js:124 launches the downloaded file detached through a shell.
- _bridge.js:179 invokes main() at import time.
- package.json contains no lifecycle scripts.
- No package-aligned functionality justifies native payload download and execution.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourceSource downloads or fetches remote code and executes it.
lib/telemetry.jsView on unpkg · L27Source file is highly similar to a previously finalized malicious package; route for source-aware review.
lib/telemetry.jsFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to claims-historical-claims-domain@35.4.4.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing claims-historical-claims-domain@35.4.4. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.