colossal_wallaby_pink-87
Ini adalah script Node.js yang bisa auto ganti nama package dalam file `package.json` dan `package-lock.json`, serta bisa publish package ke npmjs.com dengan`npm publish`. Script ini memiliki jeda waktu 1-5 menit untuk publish package selanjutnya. Sambil
This report shows the evidence for colossal_wallaby_pink-87@1.2.1, the only known version.
AI Security Review
scanned 10h ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe main entry automatically mutates the importing project's package metadata and repeatedly publishes it publicly to npm under generated names. This uses the caller's npm credentials for an unrequested publishing action, so the package is malicious.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package main entry is `autopublish.js`, and the package description says it renames package metadata and publishes to npm.
- The script changes the current project's package name and writes the change to `package.json` and `package-lock.json`.
- It runs `npm publish --access public`, using the environment's npm authentication to publish the renamed project.
- The publish loop starts at module load and schedules another publish after each attempt.
- The README describes the tool as an auto-publishing script and tells users to run `autopublish.js` directly.
Source & flagged code
7 flaggedSource mutates package metadata and republishes itself to npm.
autopublish.jsView on unpkg · L1A package entrypoint or install-time lifecycle script reaches a source file with blocking dangerous behavior.
autopublish.jsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to colossal_wallaby_pink-87@1.2.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing colossal_wallaby_pink-87@1.2.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.