commonweb-rewards
This report shows the evidence for commonweb-rewards@99.9.1. 1 of 2 known versions is blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 2mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-10968 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
The external tarball is a real unresolved supply-chain risk, but direct source inspection found no package-owned malicious behavior. Warn rather than block.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- package.json pins ltidisafe to a remote Google Storage tarball.
- Installing the package fetches external dependency code not included for review.
- package.json has no preinstall, install, or postinstall hooks.
- index.js only exports an empty object; no runtime behavior.
- No source-side file, process, credential, or network operations found.
Source & flagged code
1 flagged · loading sourcePackage manifest contains a dependency pinned to a remote tarball URL.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to commonweb-rewards@99.9.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing commonweb-rewards@99.9.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.