constructor-blocks-renderer-mailings
Constructor blocks renderer mailings runtime support module
This report shows the evidence for constructor-blocks-renderer-mailings@35.3.3, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the August 2026 dependency confusion campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package has a concrete import-time remote payload execution chain, not merely telemetry primitives. Absence of lifecycle scripts does not mitigate execution when normal package import triggers the bridge.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- index.js imports _bridge on every package import.
- _bridge.js fetches platform payloads from three obfuscated workers.dev hosts.
- _bridge.js falls back to DNS TXT payload retrieval from wel1.ru domains.
- _bridge.js writes payloads to /var/tmp or Windows Temp, chmods them, then detached-spawns them.
- No checksum, signature, or user action gates remote binary execution.
- package.json has no npm lifecycle scripts.
- The visible public class is inert, but it is followed by import-time bootstrap code.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourceSource downloads or fetches remote code and executes it.
lib/telemetry.jsView on unpkg · L27Source file is highly similar to a previously finalized malicious package; route for source-aware review.
Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to constructor-blocks-renderer-mailings@35.3.3.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing constructor-blocks-renderer-mailings@35.3.3. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.