css-svqggc-polyfill
CSS polyfill utility
This report shows the evidence for css-svqggc-polyfill@1.0.0, the only known version.
AI Security Review
scanned 18d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiInspected source proves automatic reconnaissance and external data export when the registry payload loads. This is concrete malicious behavior unrelated to a CSS polyfill, despite the absence of install hooks.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- thunderboltRegistry.js sends collected data and the hostname to a fixed external callback using fetch.
- Loading thunderboltRegistry.js immediately runs identity commands and sends their output.
- The same code reads /etc/hosts and sends up to 2,000 characters of its contents.
- The callback destination is dxpoc.gt.tc, unrelated to CSS polyfill functionality.
- registry-manifest.min.json maps registry assets to the executable thunderboltRegistry.js payload.
- The payload deletes matching require.cache entries, allowing execution again on subsequent loads.
- package.json has no install lifecycle hooks, and index.js only exports an empty object; ordinary main-entry import does not activate the payload.
Source & flagged code
9 flagged · loading sourceSource gates dangerous network, credential, or execution behavior behind CI, host, platform, time, or geo fingerprint checks.
thunderboltRegistry.jsView on unpkg · L10Source file is highly similar to a previously finalized malicious package; route for source-aware review.
thunderboltRegistry.jsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to css-svqggc-polyfill@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing css-svqggc-polyfill@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.