devplatform-spa-di
Reusable devplatform spa di components
This report shows the evidence for devplatform-spa-di@35.5.8, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the August 2026 dependency confusion campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThis is a concrete, automatically reachable remote binary staging and execution chain concealed behind an unrelated DI package API. The absence of lifecycle scripts does not mitigate import-time execution.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- index.js imports _polyfill.js on every package import.
- _polyfill.js fetches platform-specific binaries from hidden workers.dev hosts.
- _polyfill.js can reconstruct a payload from DNS TXT records under wel1.ru.
- _polyfill.js writes the payload to /var/tmp or TEMP, chmods it, then launches it detached through a shell.
- The download-and-execute path is automatic unless opt-out environment variables are set.
- lib/telemetry.js contains the same remote native-profiler download, write, and detached-launch mechanism.
- package.json has no lifecycle scripts.
- The exported DI API itself is minimal; the malicious behavior is hidden in the import-time sidecar.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourceSource downloads or fetches remote code and executes it.
lib/telemetry.jsView on unpkg · L27Source file is highly similar to a previously finalized malicious package; route for source-aware review.
lib/telemetry.jsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to devplatform-spa-di@35.5.8.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing devplatform-spa-di@35.5.8. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.