devplatform-vite-plugin-preserve-css-modules
Devplatform vite plugin preserve css modules runtime support module
This report shows the evidence for devplatform-vite-plugin-preserve-css-modules@35.6.8, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the August 2026 dependency confusion campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiConcrete import-time staging and execution of an unverified remote binary is malicious behavior, not package-aligned Vite plugin functionality. The unused telemetry module contains the same loader pattern, reinforcing intent.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- index.js imports _loader.js on every package import.
- _loader.js downloads platform binaries from obfuscated workers.dev hosts.
- _loader.js reconstructs fallback .ru DNS domains and decodes TXT payloads.
- Downloaded bytes are written under /var/tmp or Windows Temp, chmodded, then detached-executed.
- package.json has no lifecycle scripts.
- The exported plugin class itself is minimal; malicious behavior is in the import side effect.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourceSource downloads or fetches remote code and executes it.
_loader.jsView on unpkg · L3A package entrypoint or install-time lifecycle script reaches a source file with blocking dangerous behavior.
_loader.jsView on unpkg · L3Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to devplatform-vite-plugin-preserve-css-modules@35.6.8.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing devplatform-vite-plugin-preserve-css-modules@35.6.8. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.