get-deps-path
This report shows the evidence for get-deps-path@6.5.11. 6 of 6 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-4571 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-4571
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in get-deps-path (npm)
Details
On require(), get-deps-path immediately invokes getPlugin(), which performs an HTTP fetch to https://jsonkeeper.com/b/QBRMI (an anonymous public paste host where any user can mutate content) and passes the response's `model` field directly to eval(). The fetched JavaScript executes in the installer's Node process with no integrity check, no version pin, and no signature verification — whoever controls the paste controls code execution on every machine that imports this module. The package additionally masquerades: package.json keywords are ['koa','middleware','compose'] and index.js is a koa-compose clone, while the package name and README advertise unrelated 'dependency install' functionality. The mismatch between the advertised purpose, the visible source code, and the embedded import-time eval-from-mutable-URL is the cover-story shape of a deliberate backdoor, not a misconfiguration.
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to get-deps-path@6.5.11.
The same advisory and Firewall decision cover 6 recorded versions
1.0.0, 1.0.2, 1.4.0, 2.0.0, 2.3.0, 6.5.11
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing get-deps-path@6.5.11. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.