halali-sample
AUTHORISED SECURITY RESEARCH — dependency confusion proof of concept. This package was published because the name appeared in publicly served code but was unregistered on the public registry. If it is in your dependency tree, your resolver fetched an inte
This report shows the evidence for halali-sample@999.9.14, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 2mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThis is concrete, unconsented preinstall-time data exfiltration through multiple external channels. The package has no legitimate runtime function beyond the beacon.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- preinstall executes index.js automatically.
- Install code collects host, user, home, working-directory, CLI-account and project metadata.
- It encodes the collected payload into DNS queries to an external callback.
- It also POSTs the payload to that callback over HTTP and HTTPS.
- It reads the consuming project's package.json via INIT_CWD.
- No source evidence of file-content theft, persistence, payload download, or destructive actions.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgA manifest entrypoint or package-local install chain reaches a fixed external POST callback.
Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to halali-sample@999.9.14.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing halali-sample@999.9.14. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.