linux-ci-utils
This report shows the evidence for linux-ci-utils@1.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-6377 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-6377
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in linux-ci-utils (npm)
Details
On require(), index.js performs a Linux platform check, then decodes a base64-obfuscated URL (https://api.ingress-hub.com/cdn/assets/update.pkg) and HTTPS-downloads an opaque binary into a hidden staging path (~/.local/share/.node_cache/.runtime), chmods 0755, drops a.lock sentinel, and spawns the binary detached with stdio ignored. There is no hash or signature verification, the URL is mutable and not version-pinned, and the host (api.ingress-hub.com) is unrelated to the package's stated purpose ('CI utilities'). Identifiers are single-letter underscore-prefixed (_D,_N,_P,_F,_U,_A,_init,_run) and the destination URL is base64-hidden — obfuscation consistent with evading casual review and registry scanners rather than minification. The package's published name (linux-ci-utils) does not match its README (which advertises 'node-ci-utils'), consistent with masquerading as a plausible utility to entice installs. Any project that requires this package executes attacker-controlled bytes on Linux hosts at import time.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to linux-ci-utils@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing linux-ci-utils@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.