litclaude-ai
Claude Code-native workflow distribution.
This report shows the evidence for litclaude-ai@0.4.3. 3 of 15 known versions are blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.4.6, is flagged. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 2mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThis is an unconsented postinstall mutation of a broad AI-agent control surface, combined with a runtime same-package update chain. The source establishes the complete install-hook abuse path even though it does not show secret theft.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package runs a postinstall hook that invokes its install command during global npm installation.
- That install command copies a plugin, enables it in Claude Code, and changes global Claude settings.
- Its automatic updater executes npm with a version-selected release of the same package and then runs its install command.
- The updater backs up and replaces Claude plugin registry, marketplace, and settings files.
- The postinstall hook skips ordinary non-global installs, CI, and source checkouts unless forced.
- The registry request is limited to the npm registry and the updater sanitizes its child environment.
- No source evidence shows credential collection or exfiltration.
Source & flagged code
16 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references dynamic require/import behavior.
scripts/qa-uiux-visual-qa-scenarios.mjsView on unpkg · L83Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to litclaude-ai@0.4.3.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing litclaude-ai@0.4.3. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.