miguelphonk
This report shows the evidence for miguelphonk@2.0.0. 2 of 2 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-10335 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
Source inspection confirms an automatic browser-side remote execution and traffic-mediation chain, but no npm install-time or host-level payload. This is a concrete dangerous capability in a republished package and warrants a warning rather than a malicious install-time block.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- `index.html` auto-loads `https://c.vipersfutbol.com/script.js`.
- `assets/boot-CVPGRFHh.js` registers `j6k3y8.js` as a service worker.
- `j6k3y8.js` and `ct1tl/jmqwjq.js` intercept routed browser fetches.
- `assets/boot-CVPGRFHh.js` hard-codes `wss://21baseballacademy.com/fairs/`.
- `assets/ChatPage-zoA8Z6RX.js` is a 1 MB obfuscated application bundle.
- `package.json` has no preinstall/install/postinstall scripts.
- The manifest's `main` is static `index.html`, not a Node executable.
- No local filesystem, environment, or child-process access was found.
Source & flagged code
9 flagged · loading sourcePackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.jsView on unpkg · L1AWS access key ID in assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.js
assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.jsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to miguelphonk@2.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing miguelphonk@2.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.