mui-option
This report shows the evidence for mui-option@1.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-10738 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-10738
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in mui-option (npm)
Details
The sole shipped file index.js is heavily obfuscated with a base64+RC4 string-array decoder that hides all module names, URLs, and method identifiers. On import (main entrypoint), it requires child_process, os, fs, path, crypto and https, issues an https.get to a runtime-decoded URL, splits the response on ':' into an IV and ciphertext, derives a key with crypto.scryptSync, decrypts the payload with crypto.createDecipheriv, writes the decrypted bytes to a file under os.tmpdir(), and executes that file via child_process.exec. The package has no legitimate advertised functionality, its name resembles the MUI ecosystem, and no other code path exists. Any project that requires mui-option triggers execution of attacker-controlled native code on the installer host. The tarball also ships npm_recovery_codes.txt containing five 64-character hex strings matching the format of npm 2FA recovery codes, suggesting a publishing-account compromise.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flaggedNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to mui-option@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing mui-option@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.