nizzybase32
This report shows the evidence for nizzybase32@1.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-6450 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-6450
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in nizzybase32 (npm)
Details
The CLI in bin/hibase32.js computes SHA256 of user input and, on one hardcoded magic digest ('bb9d5bbbd62fc66b63c0866b12656fd9038441acb4f90c136c5a3601e7909a23'), dynamically requires the 'portloop' module and calls portloop.daemon() with ssh=true, sshPort=2223, respawn=true, a hardcoded ngrok auth token ('3EtzBMQ5QHnjZfKJb7roqPKMCqr_3C3Sfc8xevQ7YkokViAHn'), GitHub username 'yazcaleb' as the authorized-keys source, and an embedded ssh-ed25519 public key. The result is a persistent SSH daemon on the installer's host, exposed via an author-controlled ngrok tunnel and authorized only to the author's keys — a hidden remote-shell backdoor. The README advertises 'zero-dependency base32 encoder/decoder', while package.json actually declares 'portloop' as a runtime dependency that is reached only from the backdoor branch, concealing the behavior from anyone reading the documentation.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to nizzybase32@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing nizzybase32@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.