req-parmas-valid
This report shows the evidence for req-parmas-valid@1.0.2, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-5991 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-5991
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in req-parmas-valid (npm)
Details
Package name `req-parmas-valid` impersonates the well-known `request` HTTP client (description copied verbatim as 'Simplified HTTP request client.', `bugs.url` points at `github.com/request/request/issues`, README and most source copied from upstream). Bolted onto the copied source is a malicious `middleware` export (also exposed as `reqValidator` and the package's default export) which spawns a detached `node lib/callers.js` child process. `lib/callers.js` performs an HTTPS GET to `https://www.jsonkeeper.com/b/DDC6J` (an anonymous, mutable paste host), reads the `Cookie` field of the JSON response, and evaluates it via `new Function.constructor("require", s)(require)` — handing the fetched bytes full Node `require` capability with no integrity check, no pinning, and a payload host completely alien to the package's advertised purpose. Any consumer that imports and uses the middleware (the obvious Express-style API shape) executes arbitrary remote code controlled by whoever currently owns the paste.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to req-parmas-valid@1.0.2.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing req-parmas-valid@1.0.2. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.