requestor-util
This report shows the evidence for requestor-util@99.9.1. 1 of 2 known versions is blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-10965 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
The empty entrypoint and lack of lifecycle hooks rule out a direct in-package attack chain. The sole meaningful functionality is an uninspectable remote dependency, so a warning is warranted.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- package.json declares ltidisafe from a remote tarball URL.
- The declared dependency is not included in this extracted package for source review.
- index.js is an empty export, making the remote dependency the package's only substantive behavior.
- package.json has no preinstall, install, or postinstall hooks.
- index.js contains only module.exports = {}.
- No package source reads files/env, executes commands, or contacts a network endpoint.
Source & flagged code
1 flagged · loading sourcePackage manifest contains a dependency pinned to a remote tarball URL.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to requestor-util@99.9.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing requestor-util@99.9.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.