rtc-integration-frontend-sdk
This report shows the evidence for rtc-integration-frontend-sdk@99.9.0, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-10129 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-10129
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in rtc-integration-frontend-sdk (npm)
Details
rtc-integration-frontend-sdk@99.9.0 registers a postinstall lifecycle hook ("postinstall": "node index.js") that fires automatically on npm install. index.js collects installer host reconnaissance — os.hostname(), userInfo().username, platform/arch, local network interface addresses, the public IP resolved via a call to https://api.ipify.org, the current working directory, and the package name — and POSTs the collected data to a hardcoded Discord webhook at discord.com/api/webhooks/. The package name and 99.9.0 version shape are consistent with a typosquat/version-bump lure; installing the package causes unconditional install-time exfiltration of host identifiers to an attacker-controlled endpoint.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to rtc-integration-frontend-sdk@99.9.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing rtc-integration-frontend-sdk@99.9.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.