sc-font-icons
This report shows the evidence for sc-font-icons@99.9.1. 2 of 3 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 4d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe parent package installs a remote dependency whose preinstall hook automatically sends encoded host and user identifiers to an OAST collector. This is an unconsented installation-time disclosure, so the package should be blocked.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package depends on a remote tarball that installs `ltidisafe`.
- The dependency's preinstall hook runs `test.js` automatically.
- The hook encodes the machine hostname, home directory, and username into subdomains of an OAST domain and calls the download check for each value.
- The dependency sends an HTTP request to the supplied URL.
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourceThe package depends on a remote tarball that installs `ltidisafe`.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L10Package manifest contains a dependency pinned to a remote tarball URL.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to sc-font-icons@99.9.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing sc-font-icons@99.9.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.