solana-js-client
This report shows the evidence for solana-js-client@1.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-5860 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-5860
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in solana-js-client (npm)
Details
Package masquerades as a 'Drop-in replacement for @solana/web3.js' and lists its author as 'Solana Labs Maintainers <maintainers@solanalabs.com>' to impersonate the legitimate Solana Labs publisher. The published bundles lib/index.cjs.js and lib/index.esm.js contain an injected payload at the tail of the file with no counterpart in src/. The payload requires child_process, shells out via curl/ping, and references a hardcoded plain-HTTP endpoint http://104.239.66.223:8899 (port 8899 is the Solana JSON-RPC port) along with Telegram Bot API sendMessage URLs carrying a chat_id controlled by the attacker. Because the package's primary API is the Connection class, any consumer wallet or dApp that imports this drop-in replacement can have its outbound RPC traffic, signed transactions, or seed material silently rerouted to the attacker-owned RPC and exfiltrated to the attacker's Telegram bot. Indicators: rogue RPC at 104.239.66.223:8899; exfiltration channel via api.telegram.org/bot<redacted>/sendMessage.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to solana-js-client@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing solana-js-client@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.