tailwind-animaflow-kit
A configurable, namespaced Animate.css integration for Tailwind CSS
This report shows the evidence for tailwind-animaflow-kit@2.0.6, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18077 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
Manual ReviewIndependent AI assessment: manual_review. LPM AI review remains unresolved.
The inspected code follows the package’s stated Tailwind animation purpose, but a directly imported runtime dependency was unresolved and its source could not be reviewed. This leaves a material source gap, so manual review is appropriate.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- The manifest declares an animation utility dependency that could not be resolved for source inspection.
- The plugin invokes its style builder when Tailwind runs the plugin callback.
- The motion builder imports the unresolved dependency and calls it to create CSS processing behavior.
- The inspected entrypoint builds styles and registers them with Tailwind; no separate attack behavior was identified in that path.
Source & flagged code
4 flagged · loading sourceThe manifest declares an animation utility dependency that could not be resolved for source inspection.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L29The plugin invokes its style builder when Tailwind runs the plugin callback.
plugin.jsView on unpkg · L8Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to tailwind-animaflow-kit@2.0.6.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing tailwind-animaflow-kit@2.0.6. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.