test2221
This report shows the evidence for test2221@2.2.6. 3 of 3 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-11192 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-11192
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in test2221 (npm)
Details
package.json declares preinstall and postinstall lifecycle scripts that run curl against http://54.37.234.136/voicemail over plain HTTP, sending the installer's username (whoami), hostname, working directory, and a timestamp as query-string parameters. Both hooks fire automatically on `npm install`, transmitting installer host identifiers to a hardcoded bare-IP endpoint with no relation to any documented package purpose. The behavior matches reconnaissance-beacon shape suitable for follow-on targeting of the installer's host.
## Source: ossf-package-analysis (178c9841a69c4a2de3ad248f8d4dbba8f004c8e8947a34f9e6ae12404183e6e2) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'test2221' @ 2.2.4 (npm) as malicious.
It is considered malicious because:
- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to test2221@2.2.6.
The same advisory and Firewall decision cover 3 recorded versions
2.2.4, 2.2.3, 2.2.6
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing test2221@2.2.6. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.