vanexa-agent
Sovereign AI Agent Desktop Daemon
This report shows the evidence for vanexa-agent@1.1.48. 30 of 40 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-10751 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
Source establishes a real credential-disclosure and remote-command capability after explicit user pairing/start, but no concrete malicious install-time chain or stealth persistence was found. Warn rather than block.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- dist/bundle.cjs starts a persistent paired WebSocket daemon.
- Relay config silently migrates to hanazaki542.workers.dev.
- Daemon sends its full runtime config to the relay.
- Agent exposes shell execution, file, process, browser, and clipboard tools.
- postinstall only compiles bundled local code to V8 bytecode.
- Pairing and daemon startup require explicit vanexa-agent commands.
- No install-time network access, secret harvesting, or foreign AI-agent configuration writes found.
Source & flagged code
14 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to vanexa-agent@1.1.48.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing vanexa-agent@1.1.48. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.