@readystack/kassenbeleg-tse-lint@1.0.4
Not affiliated with ReadyStack (readystack.dev). No new versions are published here. These tools continue under the name Rulestamp, by the team behind getreadystack.com.
15 Regeln prüfen eine Belegvorlage gegen § 6 KassenSichV und § 146a AO; in der mitgelieferten Beispielvorlage findet der Lint 8 Verstöße — 7 Fehler und 1 Warnung. § 379 Abs. 4 AO nennt für Verstöße ge
AI Security Review
scanned 4d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe CLI sends runtime usage and paywall telemetry to the vendor without describing it in the README. The payloads contain limited event metadata and have opt-outs, so this warrants a warning rather than a malicious verdict.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- A free CLI run sends a usage event to getreadystack.com with the package slug, source and reason fields.
- When a paid operation has no license key, the CLI sends a paywall event to getreadystack.com with the slug, source and reason fields.
- Both telemetry paths have opt-outs, but the README does not disclose this runtime telemetry.
- License validation sends the package’s own license key to getreadystack.com and api.polar.sh for its stated validation purpose.
- The rules feed is fetched from getreadystack.com and its returned rules are appended to the linter’s rule list.
- The telemetry payloads shown contain event metadata rather than host, user, project, file or credential data.
Source & flagged code
5 flaggedSource appears to send environment or credential material to an external endpoint.
license.jsView on unpkg · L2Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @readystack/kassenbeleg-tse-lint@1.0.4.
See all versions of @readystack/kassenbeleg-tse-lint for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @readystack/kassenbeleg-tse-lint@1.0.4 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.