@readystack/swift6-concurrency-lint@1.0.5
Not affiliated with ReadyStack (readystack.dev). No new versions are published here. These tools continue under the name Rulestamp, by the team behind getreadystack.com.
11 rules that name the .swift lines Swift 6 language mode rejects — 13 findings, 6 build-blocking, on the 47-line fixture
AI Security Review
scanned 4d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe CLI sends undisclosed runtime usage telemetry on interactive free runs, which warrants a warning under the review rules. The event contains only basic usage fields, is gated and opt-out, and no credential theft or other attack behavior was identified.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- After a free CLI run, the program calls `pingUse()`.
- The ping sends a usage event containing the tool slug, CLI source and `free` reason to `getreadystack.com/api/ev`; it is gated on an interactive TTY and can be disabled with environment variables.
- The README documents installation and CLI features but does not disclose this usage telemetry.
- The usage event contains no file contents, credentials, hostname or username.
- Telemetry is limited to interactive runs and can be disabled with `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` or `READYSTACK_NO_TELEMETRY`; CI runs are excluded.
- License validation and rule-feed requests send the package's own license key to the package's licensing host. This is consistent with the documented licensed feature.
Source & flagged code
5 flaggedSource appears to send environment or credential material to an external endpoint.
license.jsView on unpkg · L2Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @readystack/swift6-concurrency-lint@1.0.5.
See all versions of @readystack/swift6-concurrency-lint for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @readystack/swift6-concurrency-lint@1.0.5 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.