@zzzgenesis00/bip39-mnemonic
This report shows the evidence for @zzzgenesis00/bip39-mnemonic@2.3.1, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-12030 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-12030
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in @zzzgenesis00/bip39-mnemonic (npm)
Details
Package impersonates the bitcoinjs/bip39 project (author field set to 'bitcoinjs-lib') and ships a postinstall.js that runs on `npm install`. The script collects host/user identifiers and a curated list of sensitive environment variables (including NPM_TOKEN, NODE_AUTH_TOKEN, GITHUB_TOKEN, AWS_* keys, and wallet-related PRIVATE_KEY/MNEMONIC/SEED_PHRASE), enumerates ~/.ssh, reads ~/.npmrc and ~/.gitconfig, probes Chrome/Firefox profile artifacts and crypto wallet directories, and shells out to `npm whoami` and `git config`. The collected JSON is transmitted to two hardcoded destinations: the Telegram Bot API (bot token and chat_id 7231970337 embedded in the script) and a POST to 40f955f39128bd79-178-249-214-24.serveousercontent.com/collect. Exfiltration is delayed by a randomized setTimeout (1500 + rand*2000 ms) and the module re-exports./index.js to appear legitimate.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @zzzgenesis00/bip39-mnemonic@2.3.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @zzzgenesis00/bip39-mnemonic@2.3.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.