bcc-design-icons
This report shows the evidence for bcc-design-icons@9999.0.0, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 2mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-14119 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-14119
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in bcc-design-icons (npm)
Details
bcc-design-icons@9999.0.0 declares a postinstall script `node./notify.js` that runs automatically on `npm install`. The script performs an HTTP GET to the hardcoded bare-IP endpoint http://91.201.215.48:8000/npm-poc-bcc with query parameters containing `os.hostname()` and the package name. The 9999.0.0 version, absence of any icon-library functionality expected from the package name, and callback-to-bare-IP shape match a dependency-confusion attack that identifies internal/private installers to the operator. Hostname is host-identifying data exfiltrated to an attacker-controlled destination without any installer opt-in.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to bcc-design-icons@9999.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing bcc-design-icons@9999.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.