depcruise-wrap-stream-in-html
This report shows the evidence for depcruise-wrap-stream-in-html@99.9.1. 1 of 2 known versions is blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 2mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-14068 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
The remote tarball dependency is a concrete staged-payload delivery surface, while the inspected package has no direct malicious behavior. Warn rather than block because no payload code or lifecycle execution is present in the package source.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- Manifest pins `ltidisafe` to a remote Google Cloud Storage tarball rather than a registry version.
- Package has no preinstall/install/postinstall scripts.
- Runtime entrypoint only exports an empty object.
Source & flagged code
2 flagged · loading sourceManifest pins `ltidisafe` to a remote Google Cloud Storage tarball rather than a registry version.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L9Package manifest contains a dependency pinned to a remote tarball URL.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to depcruise-wrap-stream-in-html@99.9.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing depcruise-wrap-stream-in-html@99.9.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.