gunzip-js
This report shows the evidence for gunzip-js@99.9.1. 1 of 2 known versions is blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 2mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-14056 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
The uninspectable remote dependency is a concrete provenance risk, while the package source contains no direct malicious actions. Warn pending review of the referenced tarball rather than block.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- Manifest pins dependency to an external tarball URL rather than a registry version.
- No preinstall, install, or postinstall lifecycle hook is declared.
- The sole runtime entrypoint only exports an empty object.
- No package source performs network, file, shell, or credential operations.
Source & flagged code
2 flagged · loading sourceManifest pins dependency to an external tarball URL rather than a registry version.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L10Package manifest contains a dependency pinned to a remote tarball URL.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to gunzip-js@99.9.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing gunzip-js@99.9.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.