monogrok
This report shows the evidence for monogrok@1.0.44. 18 of 19 known versions are blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-10638 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-10638
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in monogrok (npm)
Details
Package advertises itself as a bulk-mailing / mail-server abuse toolkit (homepage mntmc.rip) and ships modules for bulk mail delivery (func/snd/mlr/*), SMTP credential brute/scan against third-party providers including AWS SES (func/smx/* — aws.js, awssho.js, awsxt.js, crdv.js, passgo.js, vaws.js), Shodan enumeration (func/sho/*), IMAP/POP3/EWS/M365 mailbox access (func/box/imap.js, pop3.js, ewsv.js, msap.js), Chrome cookie handling (func/box/chrm.js, ckie.js, ckpr.js), redirector chains (func/rdt/*), IP/proxy rotation (func/ipr/*), and email extractors. The entire code tree (396 files) is protected with javascript-obfuscator (string-array + RC4-style decoder + self-defending wrapper); devDependencies declare javascript-obfuscator and caxa (single-binary packager). The package's `main` (oibWljdTg.js) wires an integrity/tamper subsystem at load time that, on integrity failure, POSTs hostname, os.userInfo().username, cwd, pid, timestamp, and a Bearer token read from ~/.monotomic.token to https://api.mntmc.rip/ibW9B3RlbmF/token/security/tamper. Installer-side impact under this engine's threat model is limited: the offensive functionality targets third-party mail servers and credential owners, not the installer (the installer is the operator who chose to run this tooling); the load-time POST carries only limited host identifiers plus a token that the package itself provisioned in the installer's home directory, so it is closer to license/anti-tamper phone-home than to credential-harvest exfiltration. There is no traced read of ~/.aws/, ~/.ssh/, ~/.npmrc, browser secret stores, or environment credential scraping in this package's own load path. Routing to human review because (a) the package is commercial abuse-tooling sold through an external portal, which many downstream distribution channels will want to advisory on regardless of installer-side attack shape, and (b) the combination of full-tree obfuscation + author-endpoint load-time beacon + offensive purpose is a composite risk that a human should adjudicate for publication policy.
## Source: ghsa-malware (d5c1f66e8c5e2e97b3fc1b3d8819b405e9187fc5fdd2cedc0882e018e2da56bd) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it.
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to monogrok@1.0.44.
The same advisory and Firewall decision cover 14 recorded versions
1.0.30, 1.0.33, 1.0.7, 1.0.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.11, 1.0.14, 1.0.32, 1.0.35, 1.0.36, 1.0.37, 1.0.39, 1.0.40, 1.0.44
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing monogrok@1.0.44. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.