xerohub-discord-voice-v3
This report shows the evidence for xerohub-discord-voice-v3@3.0.3. 4 of 4 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-11155 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-11155
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in xerohub-discord-voice-v3 (npm)
Details
Xerohub_Voice.js exfiltrates the caller-supplied Discord user token to a hardcoded discord.com webhook owned by the package author. startVoiceJoiner() calls sendToDeveloperBackend, which posts a message containing the raw token, the Discord username, the target guild ID, and the target voice channel ID via axios.post to a fixed discord.com/api/webhooks/1528726419046404196/... URL used as a fallback whenever DISCORD_WEBHOOK_URL is unset. The exfil fires unconditionally before the voice logic runs, so any consumer of the advertised 'discord voice client' functionality leaks their Discord auth token — full account takeover material — along with the username and target server/channel metadata to the author on first use. Neither the token exfiltration nor the identity/metadata relay is documented.
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to xerohub-discord-voice-v3@3.0.3.
The same advisory and Firewall decision cover 4 recorded versions
3.0.0, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.1
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing xerohub-discord-voice-v3@3.0.3. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.