aicodeman
Mission control for AI coding agents - run 20 autonomous agents with real-time monitoring and session persistence
This report shows the evidence for aicodeman@1.24.7. 4 of 69 known versions are blocked or flagged. The newest version, 1.44.0, is flagged. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 2mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package combines an automatic lifecycle trigger with unconsented mutation of the consumer repository and detached process launch. Although no exfiltration was confirmed, these install-time actions are concrete and exceed ordinary dependency setup.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package runs scripts/postinstall.js automatically after npm installation.
- The postinstall script overwrites the consumer checkout’s .git/hooks/pre-commit hook.
- The same install hook starts dist/index.js as a detached, unreferenced background process without an affirmative start command.
- The inspected install-time server is presented as localhost-only; no outbound exfiltration endpoint was established from the cited lifecycle code.
- The hook body performs a Prettier check rather than directly stealing data or deleting files.
Source & flagged code
29 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references child process execution.
dist/ai-checker-base.jsView on unpkg · L24Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to aicodeman@1.24.7.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing aicodeman@1.24.7. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.